How the scoring works

When judging a beer, it’s not about personal preference. It’s about how well a particular beer fits into its intended style.

I’ve done personal reviews before, and they’re fun, but preferences are fickle. So much of how you enjoy a beer depends on your mood, the weather, what you’ve eaten or drank before it, the setting, etc. I don’t want to do that anymore. Plus, since qualifying as a BJCP judge, I need to keep practicing my judging skills. To do that, I need to regularly sit with a beer and compare it to the style guideline. Also, not many other beer blogs focus solely on BJCP judging, so there’s that.

While judging is always subjective, this method takes out as much of the preference-subjectivity as possible and focuses more on aroma description, flavour identification, and brewing technique suggestions.

Thandi Guilherme BJCP certificate

The Criteria

Beers are evaluated against their intended BJCP style and will include any off-flavours, if there are any.

Each section has its own rubric and point allocation. The totals are added for an overall score out of 50 points. Beers rarely score 45+, and those which are completely flawed are graded at a grace-saving 13 pts.

If you’d like to practice your own scoresheets, download a template here. You can download apps for the full list of beer styles or find PDF and online versions here.

  • Comment on malt, hops, esters, and other aromatics

  • Comment on color, clarity, and head (retention, color, and texture)

  • Comment on malt, hops, fermentation characteristics, balance, finish/aftertaste, and other flavor characteristics

  • Comment on body, carbonation, warmth, creaminess, astringency, and other palate sensations

  • Comment on overall drinking pleasure associated with entry, give suggestions for improvement

  • Total of all sections